Ethereum Name Service ENS
ProtocolDomainsRank 161
$5.08
+4.1% over 24h
Data as of Nov 4, 08:30 PM
Decentralized naming system on Ethereum that maps readable .eth names to wallet addresses, websites and other data. ENS is the governance token.
Where is Ethereum Name Service’s price relative to its value?
CQuality: averageEstimated fair value
Current price
Gap to fair value
The gap to estimated value is public only for the 10 largest cryptos. For this one, it is in the analysis: estimated value, temperature, value curve and 4-year scenario.
Descriptive estimate based on past data. Not a recommendation to buy or sell, nor a price target.
Price since launch
€10,000 simulator: in the full analysis.See Ethereum Name Service’s gap for free
Scenario (an assumption, not a forecast)
For this crypto, the value curve and the scenario (underlying trend and 4-year cycle) are reserved: 3 analyses of your choice a month with a free account, all of them with Pro.
- Since Nov 2021
- −87%
- All-time high (Nov 2021)
- $75.18 · −93%
Where the money goes
Over the last 12 months.
- Fees paid by users$3.9M
- Revenue kept by the protocol$3.9M
No revenue is passed directly to token holders.
Key metrics
Compared with the median of other protocols.
| Metric | ENS | Median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price / annual revenue | 63× | 16× | 62 of 77 |
| 1-year revenue growth | Reserved for the full analysis | −50% | Reserved for the full analysis |
| Net holder yield | Reserved for the full analysis | −7% | Reserved for the full analysis |
| 12-month dilution | Reserved for the full analysis | +13% | Reserved for the full analysis |
| 1-year volatility | Reserved for the full analysis | 93% | Reserved for the full analysis |
| Worst drop over 2 years | Reserved for the full analysis | — | Reserved for the full analysis |
| 12-month revenue | $3.9M | — | — |
| Current pace (3 months annualised) | Reserved for the full analysis | — | Reserved for the full analysis |
| Market cap | $215M | — | — |
Growth, net yield, dilution, volatility and rank in the sector: in the full analysis. See Ethereum Name Service’s gap for free
CProject qualityAverage · 48/100 · regardless of priceSee details
- Real revenue16/35
$3.9M over 12 months
- Supply and dilution3/25
42% of tokens already in circulation, 26% more tokens per year
- Maturity10/15
More than 3 years of history, price -94% from its high
- Liquidity and size13/15
Daily volume 5.7% of market cap, rank 161
- Price stability6/10
59 / 100
Revenue health
In the full analysis
In the full analysis
Price risk
In the full analysis
In the full analysis
Grade from A (very strong) to E (speculative) for Ethereum Name Service. How it is calculated
Comparables
See the rankingSame family, similar size.
Methodology and sources
Ethereum Name Service’s fair value: normalised annual revenue × usual multiple (its own, blended with its sector’s if its history is short) ÷ circulating tokens.
Gap = price ÷ value − 1. Hot above +40%, warm above +15%, mild between −15% and +15%, cold below −15%, freezing below −40%.
Project summary written by Dibagger with the help of AI, from its public descriptions (CoinGecko, DefiLlama); official links taken from the same sources.
Prices updated every 30 minutes, revenue daily, computed on Nov 4, 08:30 PM. Methodology v3. Full methodology
This information describes a situation; it is not investment advice.